Can Mark Pytellek Be Trusted?
Are you asking the question, can Mark Pytellek can be trusted, and whether he is a man of honour and integrity?Chances are that you’ve reached this page because you have been introduced to Mark Pytellek, or Mark Borleis, or Mark Andrew, or Mark AndrewS, or Mark Andrew Pytellek or Mark Andrew Borleis.
Is he a Scammer? Or is he the real deal?
Is Pytellek a vexatious litigant? Does Pytellek get involved in Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments?
Or is Pytellek a "Knight in Shining Armour", a genius, an expert in Australia's Laws, the man to get you out of trouble?
Short answer: Take no notice of anything you see on this website.
Do your own research, and make your own decisions, before you hand over ANY money to him, or follow ANY of his "advice" or "methods", or use any of his "templates"
Start by asking questions. And read what others have said about Mark Pytellek
In Meads v. Meads, 2012 ABQB 571, Associate Chief Justice J.D. Rooke stated
This Court has
developed a new awareness and understanding of a category of vexatious litigant.
"As we shall see, while there is often a lack of homogeneity, and some
individuals or groups have no name or special identity, they (by their
own admission or by descriptions given by others) often fall into the
following descriptions: Detaxers; Freemen or Freemen-on-the-Land;
Sovereign Men or Sovereign Citizens; Church of the Ecumenical
Redemption International (CERI); Moorish Law; and other labels - there
is no closed list.
"In the absence of a better moniker, I have collectively labelled them as Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument litigants [AOPCA litigants@], to functionally define them collectively for what they literally are. These persons employ a collection of techniques and arguments promoted and sold by 'gurus' (as hereafter defined) to disrupt court operations and to attempt to frustrate the legal rights of governments, corporations, and individuals."
"In the absence of a better moniker, I have collectively labelled them as Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument litigants [AOPCA litigants@], to functionally define them collectively for what they literally are. These persons employ a collection of techniques and arguments promoted and sold by 'gurus' (as hereafter defined) to disrupt court operations and to attempt to frustrate the legal rights of governments, corporations, and individuals."
(Pseudolegal=
not actually legal, which is the Courts' polite way of saying that it
is completely baseless.
In plain English, it's nonsense/bunk/garbage.)
Learn more about Pytellek's Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument (OPCA) here
In plain English, it's nonsense/bunk/garbage.)
Learn more about Pytellek's Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument (OPCA) here
Ask people on Fakebook or other socially-engineered media websites.You could even ask Mark Pytellek himself, and watch as he grimaces and grins, and shrugs off your questions... after all, he has had over twenty years to practice his answers. And maybe Mark Pytellek sounds so convincing, that he actually believes what comes out of his mouth; and that Mark Pytellek is an upright, honest, genuine kind of a guy who really believes that he can help you.
Mark
Pytellek
is well rehearsed in coming up with plausible stories and excuses
... particularly his favourite:
... particularly his favourite:
"There's always
people that are going to bad-mouth me. They come to me for a
quick-fix, I show them my
Workshop Manual, and tell them to go away and study it. It's all in
there, all
the information you need. And then they come back to me expecting me to
get them out of their mess... I just don't have time... and I can't be
held responsible if they don't follow the process correctly..."
Pytellek is Quick to Show You His Successes
If only Mark Pytellek had taken the time to
study, to keep upto date, to do more research...
Because, in reality, Mark Pytellek should be held responsible, and accountable, if they don't follow the process correctly... Because he's convinced people that his process is the correct way. And he charges people money for his Workshop Manual and DVD, and to attend his seminars and workshops. He's made it his Business, his livelihood. So he should take responsibility, and take time to get people out of the mess after he's gotten them into the mess...
But how would he know? He has "no skin in the game", it's never his house that's at risk. It's not his safety that's in danger... He can walk away at any time. And he does. When the going get's tough... where is he?
Generally he's "far too busy answering emails, and taking phone calls...You have No idea what it's like. I've had 100 emails already and it's not even 8 o'clock in the morning... I just can't take all this work..."
One wonders what name is listed on his Driver Licence (NSW).
Ask him nicely and he may show you a copy of Mark Andrew Pytellek’s Birth Certificate, showing his date of birth, For November 1960, in Carlton, Victoria.
His father is listed as Guenter Wilhelm Pytellek.
So far, so good...Or read what others have said about Mark Pytellek
According to Supreme Court of Queensland, Pytellek v Evans, [2011] QSC 210, delivered on 26 July 2011:
“[The
applicant - Mark Andrew Pytellek] deposes
to being the son of Mr.
Christian Borleis, the husband of Mrs. Florida Borleis.
In the same month, 28 July 2011, according to Supreme Court of Queensland, Borleis v Wacol Correctional Centre [2011] QSC 232, the applicant was MARK ANDREW BORLEIS:
“The application has been brought by Mr. Glen Owen Carpenter who is a friend of Mr Borleis who it seems, is also known as Mr Pytellek."
In the twenty-first century, it seems there is no such thing as a “normal” family, so it may not be unreasonable to think that Mark Andrew Pytellek has two fathers, Guenter Wilhelm Pytellek and Christian Borleis.
And so, if Mark Andrew wants to use two family names, then why not?
Particularly if you are going to appear in the same Court within two days in unrelated matters. Such decisions also work when you choose to live you life with “unconventional” narratives, such as, to quote Justice Fryberg:
Mark Pytellek will tell you that judges, police, the government, and Courts are all corrupt.
That they trade on lies, deceit and fraud. By all accounts, Mark Pytellek has been saying this for many years, even before 2011. So why would he file two applications with the Supreme Court of Queensland in 2011? In the same week. Using two different names? And since he claims to be so smart, so well educated, and so experienced to get the outcomes he seeks, then why were both cases dismissed?
Are any alarm bells sounding yet? Meanwhile, you’ve probably handed over some of your sweat equity to this man, to listen to him prance up and down a stage at seminars, carrying a King James Bible under his arm, being entranced by the sweet sound of his voice, mesmerized by all his wonderful Court Room stories.
On his LinkedIN Page, he describes himself as a “Problem Solver”.
That is so true.
If you’ve got a problem of having too much cash in your wallet, why not go see if he can help you relieve that pain?
But be very wary, because if you think you are in pain, strife or financial difficulty now, then you ain't seen nothing yet...
Many witnesses have testified how they were sucked into his charming ways, and how they parted with their money to pay for his “help”. Read what others have said about Mark Pytellek
They believed this bible carrying unconventional law scholar and his "Esoteric and spiritual arguments”.
We’ve all heard it before. If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
And if it’s coming from the lips of Mark Pytellek, then you can be assured that’s the case...
Yet in 2011, he was told by to Justice Fryberg:
"In 2003 when Mr Borleis says he discovered that drivers licences and vehicle registration were required for commercial purposes and from that drew the conclusion that no licence is required for non-commercial or private use. It seems that since then he has had a number of run-ins with the authorities, possibly in relation to the driving of a vehicle without a licence.”
So imagine your surprise when Mark Pytellek tells you in 2015 that he’s applied for a Driver License? “Oh, that’s because the Police are always stopping me, and so I just thought it easier to apply for a New South Wales License...”
In the same month, 28 July 2011, according to Supreme Court of Queensland, Borleis v Wacol Correctional Centre [2011] QSC 232, the applicant was MARK ANDREW BORLEIS:
“The application has been brought by Mr. Glen Owen Carpenter who is a friend of Mr Borleis who it seems, is also known as Mr Pytellek."
In the twenty-first century, it seems there is no such thing as a “normal” family, so it may not be unreasonable to think that Mark Andrew Pytellek has two fathers, Guenter Wilhelm Pytellek and Christian Borleis.
And so, if Mark Andrew wants to use two family names, then why not?
Particularly if you are going to appear in the same Court within two days in unrelated matters. Such decisions also work when you choose to live you life with “unconventional” narratives, such as, to quote Justice Fryberg:
“Mr
Carpenter has made submissions and has also
handed up a list of
orders which he wishes to have made in addition to the release of Mr
Borleis. The affidavit and the
statement are rambling, discursive and
largely irrelevant. They refer to a long history of incidents
involving
Mr Borleis and the authorities, both police and Magistrates, which seem
to begin in 2003...
“Mr Borleis, who was brought to Court from the prison today, was allowed to make some submissions himself. He submitted that the Magistrate had no authority to deal with him. He seemed to distinguish between himself as a man in two different capacities and suggested that the law did not bind him in one of those two capacities. This rather esoteric and spiritual argument does not find any reflection in any provision of our law."
“He also asserted that there is no entitlement under our law for anyone to be kept in custody prior to their conviction for an offence. That, again, is not the state of affairs under our law. A Magistrate is empowered to remand accused persons in custody until their trial. It seems clear that that is what has happened in this case. Appeals to Magna Carta and the Bill of Rights do not alter that situation. Nothing in either of those pieces of legislation is capable of affecting the operation of subsequent legislation which confers on Magistrates the power to remand in custody.
“Finally, Mr Borleis submitted that the Magistrate lacked power because the charges which were before the Court had already been disposed of. By that he did not mean that they had been heard and determined in Court but rather that they had been withdrawn or settled as a result of negotiations between him and those who brought the charges. That is, no doubt, a matter which the Magistrates Court can deal with but I do not see at the moment how it could possibly be the fact that there was a compromise of a criminal or quasi criminal charge. Either the charge is withdrawn or it is not.
"...In any event, there is nothing before me to suggest that the warrant which the Magistrate issued was in any way imperfect or that those who are carrying out the instructions in the warrant, that is to say the General Manager of the Brisbane Correctional Centre and his staff are detaining Mr Borleis wrongfully. That being so, there is no ground for ordering the release of Mr Borleis as sought in the application, nor is there any ground for issuing an order nisi for a writ of habeas corpus. The application is therefore dismissed.”
“Mr Borleis, who was brought to Court from the prison today, was allowed to make some submissions himself. He submitted that the Magistrate had no authority to deal with him. He seemed to distinguish between himself as a man in two different capacities and suggested that the law did not bind him in one of those two capacities. This rather esoteric and spiritual argument does not find any reflection in any provision of our law."
“He also asserted that there is no entitlement under our law for anyone to be kept in custody prior to their conviction for an offence. That, again, is not the state of affairs under our law. A Magistrate is empowered to remand accused persons in custody until their trial. It seems clear that that is what has happened in this case. Appeals to Magna Carta and the Bill of Rights do not alter that situation. Nothing in either of those pieces of legislation is capable of affecting the operation of subsequent legislation which confers on Magistrates the power to remand in custody.
“Finally, Mr Borleis submitted that the Magistrate lacked power because the charges which were before the Court had already been disposed of. By that he did not mean that they had been heard and determined in Court but rather that they had been withdrawn or settled as a result of negotiations between him and those who brought the charges. That is, no doubt, a matter which the Magistrates Court can deal with but I do not see at the moment how it could possibly be the fact that there was a compromise of a criminal or quasi criminal charge. Either the charge is withdrawn or it is not.
"...In any event, there is nothing before me to suggest that the warrant which the Magistrate issued was in any way imperfect or that those who are carrying out the instructions in the warrant, that is to say the General Manager of the Brisbane Correctional Centre and his staff are detaining Mr Borleis wrongfully. That being so, there is no ground for ordering the release of Mr Borleis as sought in the application, nor is there any ground for issuing an order nisi for a writ of habeas corpus. The application is therefore dismissed.”
“Esoteric and
spiritual argument does not
find any reflection in any provision of our law"
Mark Pytellek will tell you that judges, police, the government, and Courts are all corrupt.
That they trade on lies, deceit and fraud. By all accounts, Mark Pytellek has been saying this for many years, even before 2011. So why would he file two applications with the Supreme Court of Queensland in 2011? In the same week. Using two different names? And since he claims to be so smart, so well educated, and so experienced to get the outcomes he seeks, then why were both cases dismissed?
Are any alarm bells sounding yet? Meanwhile, you’ve probably handed over some of your sweat equity to this man, to listen to him prance up and down a stage at seminars, carrying a King James Bible under his arm, being entranced by the sweet sound of his voice, mesmerized by all his wonderful Court Room stories.
On his LinkedIN Page, he describes himself as a “Problem Solver”.
That is so true.
If you’ve got a problem of having too much cash in your wallet, why not go see if he can help you relieve that pain?
But be very wary, because if you think you are in pain, strife or financial difficulty now, then you ain't seen nothing yet...
Many witnesses have testified how they were sucked into his charming ways, and how they parted with their money to pay for his “help”. Read what others have said about Mark Pytellek
They believed this bible carrying unconventional law scholar and his "Esoteric and spiritual arguments”.
We’ve all heard it before. If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
And if it’s coming from the lips of Mark Pytellek, then you can be assured that’s the case...
“You don’t need
a driver licence…”, claims
Pytellek
Yet in 2011, he was told by to Justice Fryberg:
"In 2003 when Mr Borleis says he discovered that drivers licences and vehicle registration were required for commercial purposes and from that drew the conclusion that no licence is required for non-commercial or private use. It seems that since then he has had a number of run-ins with the authorities, possibly in relation to the driving of a vehicle without a licence.”
So imagine your surprise when Mark Pytellek tells you in 2015 that he’s applied for a Driver License? “Oh, that’s because the Police are always stopping me, and so I just thought it easier to apply for a New South Wales License...”
And making a claim that he lives at the address of his father, Mr. Christian Borleis, in Larnook, Northern New South Wales.
That is, when he’s not claiming to live in a unit/street number which is in fact a Post Office Box in Nerang, Queensland.
“Oh, that’s because the Police keep harassing me, so I just give them this address…”
And then there’s a phone number. That looks like a Brisbane landline number.
It’s actually a VOIP, and it’s portable. And you’ve a very slim chance of getting through to him direct.
So he can screen his calls and decide whether or not to phone you back.
And he keeps changing his mobile phone number.
Mark Pytellek: Scammer or the Real Deal?
Well, that’s upto you to decide.
How’s it looking so far?
Would you want to put your future in his hands?
A man that uses many different names, doesn’t give you his correct residential address, doesn’t have a regular contact telephone number that you can call him directly?
You decide.
Pytellek may be "The Real Deal".
When you are working against “The Establishment”, and you’ve got a target painted on your back, you have to be real careful.
That makes sense. So may be he is the real deal?
How can you find out?
Ask him for Solid Evidence.
Ask to speak to some of his former clients, and then you’ll get the real story.
Should you hold your breath waiting?
Will you ever see any of that evidence?
Because, if you dig below the surface, would you be surprised if you find that he lives in a world of “half-truths”?
Do you think he might be an expert “Spin Doctor”, maybe good enough to be highly paid working for the mainstream political parties?
Is it possible that he can tell more lies with a smile on his face, than either the Prime Minister or leader of the opposition?
Ask him.
Ask Pytellek to SEE Written Evidence to support his Claims
Ask to see the documentation. Not for petty little things, such as parking fines, but for the Big Stuff. Like Tax office write-offs.
As you dig deeper, you’ll discover that the Tax Office never write off bad debts, in case you win the Lotto, or receive an inheritance, or have some other windfall. Yes, they may “waive” the debt for a few years, but they’ll never write it off. Why not ask the Tax Office yourself.
Mark Pytellek – Promissory Notes and Bills Of Exchange
This subject is Mark Pytellek’s flag ship.
The Keystone of his portfolio, Promissory Notes and Bills Of Exchange, his "get out of jail" card... [Which in reality is your invitation to get three square meals a day and an orange jump suit.]
Read more about the subject of Promissory Notes and Bills Of Exchange here.
If you've heard him "teach" on the subject, you'd think Mark Pytellek is an expert of Promissory Notes and Bills Of Exchange.
Because Mark Pytellek’s such an expert on the subject of Promissory Notes and Bills Of Exchange, and they work so well for him, he demands payment by cash, not by his wonderful process of debt reduction.
He'll even draw up a "Private Trust Deed" document for you, at a cost of course, but not redeemable using his system of Promissory Notes and Bills Of Exchange... And when you are in deep doo-doo, he’ll refer you to his “ex-lawyer” friend, Zoltan Varseghy, so he too can get a slice of the action.
It seems that Mark Pytellek and Zoltan Varseghy have known each other for over twenty years.
Zoltan Varseghy claims, on his LinkedIn page, to be:
“Attorney General Githabul Ngarakbul Nation – Te Taou Nation and Sovereignty Consultant - Githabul Ngarakbul Original Nation.
Also “Legal Services Manager”, Victorian Building and Architectural, since January 2018.
All very impressive.
Just like the fees he’ll charge you, whilst telling you there are no guarantees.
Of course there are no guarantees.
But what if you could be guaranteed that you’ll be deeper out of pocket than before you met either of these characters?
Zoltan Varseghy’s LinkedIn Profile states: “My 30 years plus experience has created many solutions to my clients and a wonderful feeling of satisfaction to myself...”
Now, that is VERY impressive... What if you start digging around, and find that some of his clients no longer have to do any of the housework… because they’ve lost their homes?
Or that he deserted them when the going got tough?
That he took on cases that got too difficult for him, and he left his clients stranded?
And why wouldn’t Zoltan’s bank balance give him “a wonderful feeling of satisfaction…”?
Ask to see the evidence, to view the supporting documentation to show that he has had successes.
Ask to speak to former clients... before you hand over any money.
Or would you prefer to let the FACTS get in the way of good stories?
= = = = =
= == = = =
Mark Pytellek: Scammer or the Real Deal?
Do your own research...
= = = = = = == = = =
Or follow the advice of a Senior Detective with the Queensland Police Service ...
R U N ...
Run, far, far away from this man...
And read what others have said about Mark Pytellek
Mark Pytellek: Scammer or the Real Deal?
Do your own research...
= = = = = = == = = =
Or follow the advice of a Senior Detective with the Queensland Police Service ...
R U N ...
Run, far, far away from this man...
And read what others have said about Mark Pytellek